Other

How Important is a Snooker Crowd to a Players Performance

129.jpg

As we all watch the ongoing 2020 World Championship, one of the notable changes to this year’s format is the distinct absence of spectators. Now, the idea of a reduced crowd was experimented with on the opening day of the WSC however, due to government announcements that very day meant that a spectator presence was no longer possible. But how much impact does an audience have on the performance of a player?

Typically in sports, crowds are separated into the sides in which they support. I’d like to think that snooker is a little less akin to this considering its individuality and the overarching respect for the game itself. Similar to tennis, snooker crowds are encouraged to be more revering towards the players and avoid making any distracting sounds, particularly on a backswing. Although, much like any other sport which includes a crowd presence, snooker fans actively participate in the experience and drama that unfolds in any given match – multiplied in the Crucible.

Sports are very psychological and mental, just as much as they are physical. This is particularly applicable to snooker where matches can last hours upon end and competitors need to keep themselves in the game mentally so that they can perform on the table physically. Having a crowd presence that can appreciate a good shot or century break will have a positive influence on a player’s confidence, which will encourage them to continue playing well.

Much like a boxer who will ride the wave of a crowd when in the middle of a positive exchange against his/her opponent, a Crucible crowd will have a similar effect. A player will be able to sense the crowds excitement while concentrating on the game at hand therefore, will also aim to perform in a manner that will meet the expectations of those spectating. And any snooker player will tell you the difference between being able to feel the presence of a live crowd, as opposed to playing in an empty arena for those watching at home.

Clearly, a live audience has a tremendous impact of the mental side of a player. So if we take that audience away, surely that takes away the mental pressure from those competing, right? Kind of. It depends on the player. Some players will thrive under a crowd presence while others may not do so well. Which is what makes this year’s WSC so interesting to watch. We’ve already seen how some players are coping with the silence of the room, comparable to if they were just playing in practice; but nothing gets rid of the nerves of playing for the World Championship.

So while perhaps some nerves are settled from the lack of an audience, this will be offset by competing in the most coveted tournament of the season. And while it may be more relaxing for a player to make a big break, an exemplary shot or century won’t feel the same to a player without a crowd reacting to the spectacle. The best way to think of it would be to imagine one of your favourite 147 breaks…now imagine that same 147 break without a crowd, or even watching it on mute. It just isn’t the same, is it?

Broadcasters have tried to simulate audience participation with a soundboard of crowd applause similar to a laughing track in a sitcom. In effect, it’s a person with their finger on the ‘applause’ button for use at the end of a frame. This has received a mixed reception from viewers, but a poll by WST showed that 55% did welcome the addition, while acknowledging that it is far from perfect.

But others shouldn’t be too upset with this. This isn’t something that anyone has had to go through before, so there are going to be ‘beta testing’ phases for different features. Fans are having to adapt just like the players and staff involved in bringing us this WSC. We should just enjoy the fact that there is a World Championship this year and how we’ve already had some incredible Round 1 matches. And with that being said, onto Round 2!


126.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: The Science Behind Snooker Chalk

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!

The Science Behind Snooker Chalk

126.jpg

Alongside the cue and its tip, snooker chalk is another crucial piece of equipment that is vital to playing a successful shot. It can seem fairly insignificant due to how frequently it is used and how infrequently it is mentioned (except in the occurrences of poor contacts) however, I wanted to look a little further into the properties of snooker chalk and the effect that it has on the overall match.

In a nutshell, the effect that chalk has on a shot is simple. You have the tip of a snooker cue and the cue ball; but they’re not the components that are in contact with each other. The application of chalk creates a barrier between them that increases the friction upon contact of the two surfaces. It’s primarily used when playing a shot off the centre of mass i.e. sidespin. Most top level professionals rarely play centre-ball/plain ball shots hence, the need to continuously apply chalk.

When striking the cue ball off-centre, you are aiming for a smaller portion of the total area. Therefore, it’s necessary to increase the grip of the cue tip to ensure that when the ball is struck, the energy that is created from the increased friction is transferred to the spin on the ball. By creating a coarser surface with increased grip, you are reducing the chances of miscues.

Top tip: there is a correct way to apply chalk. If you see a chalk that has an enormous hole in it, then it has been used incorrectly. Drilling a circle into the chalk as a method for application actually creates a smoother surface on the tip, which is the opposite of what you’re going for. Just stick with the even brushes of chalk as shown by the pros and you’ll be fine.

In the early 19th century, traditional chalk was used in billiards for the perceived benefits that we know of it today: improved grip and greater shot selection. The chalk used was similar to that of blackboard chalk. Although, the problem with this, similar to when blackboard dusters are clapped together is that it results in a substantial dispersal of chalk dust. This is when developments were made to the chalk we are familiar with, which don’t actually consist of chalk but numerous compounds/abrasives that result in less residual dust. You’ll see how important this can be soon.

You’ve probably heard of kicks (or poor contacts) occurring in snooker. The overwhelming factor that is commented as to the reasoning for these is down to the chalk. This can be from residual chalk that is left upon striking the cue ball. Or the build-up of chalk on the table from continuous play. Either way, when the snooker balls roll over these ‘chalked’ surfaces, they can create the forces that upon impact, causes the cue/object ball to bounce in the air slightly, while deflecting the balls off their intended course.

This is where manufacturers like Taom have made revolutions in the chalk game. As opposed to player constantly having to get balls cleaned by the referee, Taom created a chalk with properties that reduce chalk transferring from the tip to the cue ball. This in theory, and later in practice, proved to be effective in that professionals that have taken up this newer, expensive piece of equipment have noted the significant reduction in kicks and chalk residue.

So why don’t all player use this? Taom chalk doesn’t come without its risks, the primary being the increased chances of miscues. Dominic Dale stated that in comparison to Triangle, Taom chalk is more ‘cakey and powdery’, which can result in a lesser grip and thus, more miscues which have been witnessed on occasion in competition. However, Taom have developed a softer version of their chalk to help with these circumstances.

The progress in the chalk market is determined by a manufacturer’s ability to create a compound which has the perfect balance between softness and abrasiveness. This is why chalk was the perfect choice and there had been few changes in the chalks that players would use for years.

What do you think? What is your chalk of choice?


56.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: The Impact of Snooker Tips

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!

Snooker Events in Australia?

122.jpg

There was a time where snooker tournaments would reach a variety of different countries such as Dubai, Thailand and Australia; the latter of which has actually been fortunate on a couple of occasions to host the World Championship. Although, Australia hasn’t been home to a ranking event (or otherwise) since 2015. Considering the history associated with snooker and Australia, how has this come to be the case?

The event that we are all most likely familiar with is the Australian Goldfields Open (AGO), which was last held in Bendigo, Australia in 2015. Following that season, the event fell off the calendar, for reasons unknown. But we can at least hazard a few guesses. Bearing in mind the global presence of Australia, it would seem odd to not include a snooker event in this region; a region once acknowledged by Barry Hearn as an important part of snooker’s global expansion.

One factor we can look at is the travel time associated with an Australian hosted event. A quick online search will tell you that a flight to Australia (from the UK) will take on average 22+ hrs. Given how tightly packed the calendars are, this doesn’t leave much time for players to get used to the new time zone and other conditions, leading to certain players potentially being quite impacted by the resultant jet lag.

This could act as a deterrent for many top players choosing not to compete however, if you observe the draws for the final few AGO tournaments, you can see that the brackets are still filled with numerous top seeds. Even though players seemed to be okay with competing at this distance, World Snooker may have taken the decision that an extra 7-8 hours from China to Australia would be too much for players to bear.

Another factor is likely the viewership. Perhaps the viewing figures/ticket sales weren’t as high as WST executives were hoping for. They gave the tournament a chance for a few years but it might not have reached what they were expecting; no longer making the tournament viable for them. The location choice may have impacted this result – Bendigo is a city in Victoria, approximately 150 km north of Melbourne which many, at the time, considered as a weak choice of location with poor advertising for the sport.

This leads to the most likely reason – profitability. Whatever the reason, snooker just isn’t as popular a sport in Australia as it is in say, China. The AGO was kicked off the calendar during a time where an increased tournament presence was emerging in China, with the additions of the World Open, China Championship and so on. In a tightly packed calendar where events are taking place almost every week, WST need to organise and select events that they feel will make them the most money, and China is a priority region for them for this purpose.

But does that mean that Australia shouldn’t have an event on the calendar? I don’t think so. There isn’t a growing amateur scene in the Oceanic region, with increased relations with the WPBSA/WSF. If the WST can secure a space in the calendar (which includes a brief buffer period to allow for travel), increase the prize fund and choose an optimal location, then this can certainly achieve their goals while providing Australia an event to look forward to. I’m certain WST has the connections to accomplish this and we can one day hope to see the return of the Australian Masters.


45.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: Are There Too Many Events In The Calendar?

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!

What Is The Snooker Challenge Tour?

120.jpg

Considering all the snooker that we watch consists of main-tour events where professionals compete to take a bite of the £14 million+ season prize fund, the Challenge Tour exists to provide amateur players the opportunities to advance their progress to reach the main tour and professional status. The Challenge Tour is a secondary circuit run throughout the snooker season whereby successful individuals will be granted a two-year tour card to compete with the best.

Much like events such as the World Open, Grand Prix and Paul Hunter Classic, the Challenge Tour was formerly known by different monikers such as the UK Tour or Minor Tour. It mainly ran from 1997-05 but was then recently revived in the 2018/19 season with more events and opportunity for those in the amateur game. The Challenge Tour used to contain four tournaments throughout the season but since its recent revival, this number has been increased to ten.

Eligible contestants for the Challenge Tour are those at the top of the Order of Merit (i.e. equivalent Q-School ranking) with the exception of those who have already qualified for the main tour via Q-School. Each of the ten tournaments will include 64 participants with a potential of up to 8 wildcard players being considered to compete if number count is low.

Prize money is also up for grabs for those who compete in the Challenge Tour; albeit a fairly minimal amount. While it is better than nothing, it can be difficult to offset some of the travel and accommodation costs unless you win an event, particularly as some of the events can take place across Europe. Winning an event will earn a competitor £2000 and the Order of Merit ranks these players in the same way as professionals – using the money list, i.e. £2000 is equivalent to 2000 ranking points and all matches are played over a best-of-five (first to three frames).

The top two performers in the Challenge Tour will be granted a two-year tour card. In the case of the 2019/20 season, a series of playoffs will be contested which will involve the winners of the ten challenge events as well as some from the rankings that perhaps didn’t win an event. The two final winners of the playoffs (i.e. the semi-finalists) are the successful players that are then ranked professional status.

But how does the Challenge Tour differ from Q-School? While Q-School is the formal qualification process for the main snooker tour, the Challenge Tour provides those who weren’t successful another chance to secure a tour card for the following season through these ten events. If they are not successful in the Challenge Tour, they can try via Q-School once again to qualify for the main tour next season.

The renewal of the Challenge Tour has aided in bridging the gap between amateurs and professionals by providing them a platform to increase their competitive exposure. While it may not be perfect, amateurs of the sport will be grateful for the additional chances to accomplish their goals of becoming a professional player and competing with those they aspire towards.


18.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: What is the Q School?

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!