What is the situation with Women's Snooker?

When Reanne Evans won her 12th world title, I observed an interesting fact that the total prize fund for the entire World Championship was only £15,000. And that is total – not even the winners share. For context, just competing in the first round of the WSC gets each contender £20,000. This made me wonder about other differences in the World of Women’s Snooker.

That was a convenient segue - women’s snooker is run by the WWS (World Women’s Snooker). They are responsible for organising and running all the snooker events for female competitors and are provided support by the WPBSA. Much like the main tour we are all used to, events are held globally and throughout the year. Although, as I imagine most aren’t too aware of the women’s tour, there are some differences.

There are considerably less tournaments than on the main tour. In the 2018/19 season, there were only 8 events held in the WWS calendar, which is a fraction in comparison to the main. Certain players like O’Sullivan would probably welcome a spread out calendar like that but for most, they would probably prefer a few more options. These 8 events don’t include the main tour events that women can take part in such as Q School, Shoot Out or the World Championship.

Furthermore, the length of the matches are much shorter. In order to win the World Championship, the winner only needs to take 6 frames in the final as opposed to the 18 frames required at the Crucible.

Then there’s the prize money. The WWS claimed that the prize fund for 2018/19 was at least £50,000. Although I couldn’t confirm this, it seems realistic given the number of tournaments. The aim of the WWS is to keep this figure rising as the years roll on. I won’t go into a rant about this as I want to keep this more informative but this number should be multiplied significantly. Bear in mind, this is for the entire season.

Obviously, women’s snooker doesn’t bring in the viewership or revenue of their main tour counterparts, but you would expect the WPBSA to be able to set aside a more reasonable budget to provide an incentive and make things more worthwhile for female players.

There also needs to be a focus on encouraging women to participate in this male-dominated sport in order to try and root out the next big talent. I think it does come to participation numbers and by giving the female players a larger canvas of tournaments to be able to compete in will raise the standard in the women’s game and hopefully, allow more females to qualify for the big events on the main tour.

Have we seen the best of Mark Selby?

The years 2014-2017 were the best of Mark Selby’s career. But were they the best of his career so far? – Well that’s the question. Have we seen the best of the former World No. 1 (now ranked 6) or will his recent low spell in the past couple of seasons stay in the past?

Selby has only won one ranking event this past season and two the season before that. None of these wins were Triple Crown. These performances also saw Selby lose his No. 1 rank which he held for 7 consecutive years before that. If we compare that to his 2016/17 season (arguably his best), he won 4 ranking events, including the Worlds and UK Championship.

His ranking position wouldn’t have suffered so much if he performed better on average in each tournament he played in. The furthest Selby got in a tournament besides the China Championship was the semi-finals of the NI Open in the classic against O’Sullivan. Besides that, he suffered numerous first and second round exits. This is similar in the 2017/18 season as well. So, what happened?

One thing I noticed was that Selby’s play has shifted to more of an aggressive approach in the recent past, particularly this past season. He has been taking on a lot more long shots that he normally wouldn’t a few years prior. This was probably due to his confidence of winning 3 world titles in 4 years. You could even observe a little of this confidence when he won WSC 2017 which he was playing at his best.

Also, the level of competition has been getting far stronger over the past couple of years which can make it difficult to replicate a good season. This would have contributed to many of Selby’s first and second round exits.

Normally, if Selby has had a poor season he would make up for it in the WSC – which is exactly what happened in 2015/16 when the WSC was the only ranking event he won. And he didn’t even play that well to win that year. The past two years had seen first and second round exits at WSC. In the past two years, I still would have had Selby as a favourite to win WSC, but now, I’m not too sure.

I, for one, hope that Selby can find this confidence of 2014-17 and carry it forward to the upcoming seasons. As players such as Trump, Higgins and Robertson become crowd favourites to win the World Championship, it would be nice for Selby to come in to show that he isn’t to be forgotten about

The Cost of being a Snooker Player

Previously, we got an idea of how much snooker players could potentially earn by looking at the prize winnings of all the ranking events in the season. Click here to read that Short. However, all these monies don’t go directly into a snooker player’s bank account as they do have to account for the expenses they incur for participating in these events.

The main costs that are undertaken by snooker players involve travel, accommodation and entry fees. Neil Robertson stated in an interview a couple years ago that tournament entry fees amount to between £4000-4500 a year alone. For players starting out or those working part-time alongside playing snooker, this is a significant cost especially if they don’t earn much in the form of tournament winnings.

Travel and accommodation costs can be upwards of £10,000. This is a fairly conservative estimate considering how many tournaments there are nowadays and the distances players have to travel to compete. Although snooker isn’t as popular as other sports, it is still recognised and played all over the world. Particularly, events held in China and India pose the largest expense to a sport which has most of its player residing in the UK and Europe.

This doesn’t take into account sponsorship’s which can definitely help with alleviating the costs of travel for a snooker player. With the backing of a professional sponsor, they can often cover the costs of travel and accommodation for a player. But the problem are for those players struggling to get in the spotlight enough to earn sponsorship backing.

If we assume rough expenses to be between £15,000-20,000 and look at the 1 year ranking list then it seems that those outside the Top 64 would be earning roughly the equivalent of a university graduate’s salary. And when a significant amount of these players will have families to support, are the expenses incurred for being a pro snooker player too high? Should some kind of subsidised element be involved?

Ronnie O'Sullivan and the World Championships

His last major run was to the finals in 2014, where he famously lost to Mark Selby. Since then, he hasn’t made it past the quarter-finals. This year he was eliminated by an amateur in the first round. Will O’Sullivan lift the coveted prize once again? Or for historical purposes: 3 times again?

For me personally, in the past few years O’Sullivan hasn’t been a favourite of mine going into World Championship tournaments. Don’t get me wrong, I am a huge O’Sullivan fan and he is always a favourite of mine going into literally any other tournament; but for the World Championship…not quite.

Understandably, he is always the bookies favourites going into the World’s and other tournaments and this will continue to be the case until he retires, as he will always be ‘the guy’ to beat. But how come his track record hasn’t been as successful in recent years? I think it comes down partly to O’Sullivan and also a little bit to the tour as well.

One thing that it comes to is consistency. O’Sullivan isn’t the most consistent player out there. When it comes to World Championships, as other players are frequent to point out, it’s all about which O’Sullivan turns up on the day. Often, he does extremely well in the first couple rounds of the World’s then his play does a complete U-turn in the next round. This was evident in 2015-18. Even in the 2018 Masters, where he whitewashed Marco Fu 6-0 in the first round, then lost 6-1 to Mark Allen in the next round was a prime example of this.

A lot say that it comes down to his outside interests, but I don’t think this is the case. I mean, the guy took a whole year off between World Championships and came back to win it the following year. I also think that the outside interests help to keep O’Sullivan interested in the game and avoid the dangers of over-practicing/burning out.

Also, there are more tournaments being introduced into the circuit as the years roll on. Almost all of these represent the shorter format matches which better suit O’Sullivan, his playstyle and also his patience levels. By playing in more tournaments with this kind of format, it makes it difficult to focus on the longer matches that come with the World Championship.

So, the question as to if O’Sullivan will lift the World’s again. I think it will happen. Whether it will happen 3 more times, that’s tricky to say. But I think it will happen at least once. Even though he has spells where it seems like he plays uncharacteristically, there’s no decline in his game in any areas.

If Mark Williams and John Higgins can win World titles and make consecutive finals then it’s only a matter of time before O’Sullivan will as well. And even though he says that titles don’t mean that much to him anymore, I promise you winning at least one more World’s will be driving him forward.